Chem 3240 · Lecture 8.6
\[\vec{\mu} = \sum_{i=1}^{N} Q_i\,\vec{r_i}\]
\[\hat{\mu}_x = \sum_{i=1}^{N} Q_i x_i, \quad \hat{\mu}_y = \sum_{i=1}^{N} Q_i y_i, \quad \hat{\mu}_z = \sum_{i=1}^{N} Q_i z_i\]
\[\left\langle \vec{\hat{\mu}} \right\rangle = \int \psi^* \, \vec{\hat{\mu}} \, \psi \, d\tau\]
Similar electronegativity: orbitals spread evenly, a covalent bond.
Different electronegativity: orbitals lopsided, ionic character and a permanent dipole.
Neither pure ionic nor pure covalent bonds truly exist.
Compare the cost of electron transfer.
Li ionization energy \(\approx 5.4\) eV, F electron affinity \(\approx 3.5\) eV.
Difference of only 1.9 eV, so ionic bonding is favorable.
Contrast the C-H bond: the gap exceeds 10 eV, so it stays covalent.

\[E(R) = \frac{Q_1 Q_2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R} + b\,e^{-aR}\]

Close in, filled orbitals overlap.
Both bonding and antibonding orbitals fill.
Antibonding repulsion outweighs bonding attraction.
This is the Pauli repulsion term \(b\,e^{-aR}\).
An avoided crossing switches ionic to covalent on the way out.
The molecule breaks into neutral atoms, not ions.
\[D_e(\text{MX} \to \text{M} + \text{X}) = D_e(\text{MX} \to \text{M}^+ + \text{X}^-) - E_{ea}(\text{X})\]
Even with no chemical bond, molecules attract weakly.
Three weak attractions, all scaling as \(1/R^6\):
Balanced by Pauli repulsion at short range.
\[V(R) = 4\epsilon\left[\left(\frac{\sigma}{R}\right)^{12} - \left(\frac{\sigma}{R}\right)^{6}\right]\]
A dipole is the expectation value of \(\sum_i Q_i \vec{r_i}\); an ionic bond is Coulomb attraction \(Q_1 Q_2/4\pi\epsilon_0 R\) tamed by Pauli repulsion, and weak \(1/R^6\) forces plus that repulsion give the Lennard-Jones potential \(4\epsilon[(\sigma/R)^{12} - (\sigma/R)^{6}]\).
Chem 3240 · Quantum Mechanics