The Vector Model for Adding Angular Momenta¶

Fig. 1 Vector addition model used to determine the quantization of total angular momentum from individual contributions.
In many-electron atoms, each electron has both orbital and spin angular momenta. First, for simplicity, consider only the total orbital angular momentum operator:
where is the number of electrons and is the angular momentum operator for electron . The projection operator along the -axis is then:
is the total orbital angular momentum.
are the individual angular momenta.
are operators; are the corresponding quantum numbers.
We assume a light atom and thus neglect the spin-orbit coupling.
Total Orbital Angular Momentum¶
Consider an atom with two electrons having orbital angular momenta and . The maximum total angular momentum is obtained when the two vectors are parallel: . When they point in opposite directions, . Hence the total angular momentum quantum number can take values (the “Clebsch-Gordan series”):
For example, if we have two electrons in -orbitals, this gives , or 0. Furthermore, for we can have ; for , ; and for , .
It is instructive to check that we have the same number of states in both representations (the uncoupled versus the coupled representation). In the uncoupled representation there are states (3 -orbitals and 2 electrons), and in the coupled representation .
Usually the closed-shell inner-core electrons are not included in the consideration, as they do not contribute to the end result.
Total Spin Angular Momentum¶
The total spin angular momentum operator for a many-electron atom is:
and the -component of the total spin operator is:
Here and refer to the spin angular momenta of the individual electrons. The total quantum number is:
This value ranges from to , and the total quantum number is given by:
For example, for two electrons, (a “triplet state”) or (a “singlet state”).
Total Angular Momentum (Combined Orbital and Spin)¶
The total angular momentum operator is the vector sum of and :
The total quantum number , with its corresponding magnetic quantum number , is given by:
The coupling scheme above is called the coupling or Russell-Saunders coupling.
This approach is only approximate when spin-orbit coupling is included in the Hamiltonian. Spin-orbit interaction arises from relativistic effects; here we simply think of it as coupling the orbital and spin angular momenta with some given magnitude (the “spin-orbit coupling constant”).
The spin-orbit effect is larger for heavier atoms. For these atoms the coupling scheme begins to break down and only remains a good quantum number. This means, for example, that one can no longer speak about singlet and triplet electronic states. The coupling scheme works reasonably well for the first two rows of the periodic table.
Atomic Terms and Selection Rules¶

Fig. 2 Possible atomic terms for given electronic configurations.
The table above shows the various term symbols that can correspond to given electronic configurations. A term symbol contains information about the total orbital and spin angular momenta as well as the total angular momentum ():
Both and are written as numbers, while is written as a letter: S for , P for , D for , and so on. The quantity is the spin multiplicity (1 = singlet, 2 = doublet, 3 = triplet, ...).
The term symbol specifies the ground-state electronic configuration exactly. Note that only the valence electrons contribute to the term symbol.
Because of electron, electron interactions and spin-orbit coupling, we expect a splitting of energy levels that can be described by various term symbols.

Fig. 3 Relationship of configurations, terms, levels, and states. The top row indicates the degree of approximation and type of interaction; the second row shows the group of states that are degenerate in energy; and the bottom row indicates the good quantum numbers at each level of approximation.

Fig. 4 Relationship of terms and levels for carbon. Assuming a spherically symmetric electron distribution, a single energy state is allowed. Including the dependence of electron repulsion on the directions of and splits this into terms of different energy, here P, D, and S. Coupling of and further splits the terms into levels according to , here S, D, P, P, and P. The separation of the levels for the P term has been multiplied by a factor of 25 to make it visible.
The “” method above is fast and convenient but does not always work and cannot show, for instance, that P does not exist. A more complete approach lists every possible electron configuration (microstate), labels each by its and values, counts how many times each combination appears, and decomposes the result into term symbols. The total number of microstates is:
where is the number of electrons and is the orbital angular momentum quantum number (1 for -orbitals, 2 for , and so on). Counting the combinations and decomposing them into term symbols confirms the carbon result and shows explicitly that P does not exist.
Hund’s Rules¶
Hund’s (partly empirical) rules are:
The term arising from the ground configuration with the maximum multiplicity lies lowest in energy.
For levels with the same multiplicity, the one with the maximum value of lies lowest in energy.
For levels with the same and but different , the lowest-energy state depends on how much the subshell is filled:
If the subshell is less than half-filled, the state with the smallest is lowest in energy.
If the subshell is more than half-filled, the state with the largest is lowest in energy.

Fig. 5 Term symbols for the ground states of the elements across the periodic table.
Spin-Orbit Interaction¶
This relativistic effect can be incorporated into non-relativistic quantum mechanics by adding the following term to the Hamiltonian:
where is the spin-orbit coupling constant and and are the orbital and spin angular momentum operators.
The total angular momentum commutes with both and , so it can be specified simultaneously with the energy. We say that the quantum number remains good even when spin-orbit interaction is included, whereas and do not. The operator dot product can be evaluated in terms of the quantum numbers:
For example, in alkali atoms (, ) the spin-orbit interaction breaks the degeneracy of the excited P state into P and P (with S as the ground state).
Atomic Spectra and Selection Rules¶
The following selection rules for photon absorption or emission in one-electron atoms can be derived by considering the symmetries of the initial and final state wavefunctions:
where is the change in the principal quantum number, the change in orbital angular momentum, and the change in its projection.
Qualitatively, the selection rules follow from conservation of angular momentum:
Photons are spin-1 particles with (left-circularly polarized light) or (right-circularly polarized light).
When a photon interacts with an atom, the angular momentum may change only by +1 or -1, exactly as in the selection rules above.
Selection Rules for Multi-Electron Atoms¶

Fig. 6 Allowed electronic transitions of the He atom, organized by term symbol.
, except that a transition from to does not occur.
for the electron that is being excited (or is responsible for fluorescence).
, except that a transition from to does not occur.
: the electron spin does not change in an optical transition. The opposite holds for magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which deals with changes in spin states.
In some exceptional cases these rules may be violated, but the resulting transitions are extremely weak (“forbidden transitions”). Because of the last rule, some excited triplet states can have very long lifetimes, since the transition to the ground singlet state is forbidden (metastable states).
The Nature of Light, Matter Interaction¶
Light is electromagnetic radiation, so it has both electric and magnetic components. The oscillating electric field drives transitions in optical spectroscopy (UV/Vis, fluorescence, IR), whereas the magnetic component drives transitions in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR, EPR/ESR).
Photon emission from an atom (for example, fluorescence) is difficult to understand with the quantum mechanical machinery developed so far. The plain Schrodinger equation predicts that excited states in atoms would have infinite lifetime in vacuum. This is not observed in practice: atoms and molecules return to the ground state by emitting a photon. This transition is caused by fluctuations of the electromagnetic field in the vacuum.