Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Measurement: Eigenvalues and Expectation Values

Operators 2 showed that observables are Hermitian operators, with real eigenvalues and orthonormal eigenfunctions. This lecture is about what happens when we use one: postulates 3 and 4, what a measurement returns and how often. The map shows how the pieces connect.

Source
<Figure size 1150x330 with 1 Axes>

Fig. How the postulates connect, in the order of these lectures. A state and a Hermitian observable give real eigenvalues, the possible readings, and orthogonal eigenfunctions, the axes. Any state is a superposition along those axes, with components cn=⟨ϕn∣ψ⟩c_n = \langle \phi_n \vert \psi\rangle. One measurement returns a single reading ana_n and leaves the state in ϕn\phi_n. Repeated on many identically prepared copies, the reading ana_n turns up in a fraction pn=∣cn∣2p_n = \lvert c_n\rvert^2 of them, and the readings average to ⟨A⟩\langle A\rangle. Circled numbers are the postulates in the table of Operators 1. This lecture covers the two middle boxes; time evolution (5) is the subject of Time Dependence.

Eigenfunctions are a coordinate system

The eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator work like the perpendicular axes of a plane. We start with a vector in a plane, then take the same two steps with a function, in the same Dirac notation: the structure is identical.

A vector: build it, then project

∣v⟩=c1∣u1⟩+c2∣u2⟩\lvert v\rangle = c_1\lvert u_1\rangle + c_2\lvert u_2\rangle
⟨u1∣v⟩=c1 ⟨u1∣u1⟩⏟1+c2 ⟨u1∣u2⟩⏟0=c1\langle u_1 \vert v\rangle = c_1\,\underbrace{\langle u_1 \vert u_1\rangle}_{1} + c_2\,\underbrace{\langle u_1 \vert u_2\rangle}_{0} = c_1
Source
<Figure size 960x430 with 2 Axes>

Fig. Left: the vector ∣v⟩\lvert v\rangle built from c1∣u1⟩c_1\lvert u_1\rangle and c2∣u2⟩c_2\lvert u_2\rangle, tip to tail. Right: the same coefficients found by projection; each ck=⟨uk∣v⟩c_k = \langle u_k \vert v\rangle is the shadow of ∣v⟩\lvert v\rangle on its own axis. Here c1=3c_1 = 3 and c2=1.5c_2 = 1.5.

A function: the same two steps

∣ψ⟩=c1∣ψ1⟩+c2∣ψ2⟩+c3∣ψ3⟩+⋯\lvert\psi\rangle = c_1\lvert\psi_1\rangle + c_2\lvert\psi_2\rangle + c_3\lvert\psi_3\rangle + \cdots
⟨ψm∣ψ⟩=∑ncn ⟨ψm∣ψn⟩⏟δmn=cm,⟨ψm∣ψ⟩=∫0Lψm∗ ψ dx\langle \psi_m \vert \psi\rangle = \sum_n c_n\,\underbrace{\langle \psi_m \vert \psi_n\rangle}_{\delta_{mn}} = c_m, \qquad \langle \psi_m \vert \psi\rangle = \int_0^L \psi_m^*\,\psi\,dx
Source
<Figure size 960x350 with 2 Axes>

Fig. The state ψ=30 x(1−x)\psi = \sqrt{30}\,x(1-x) in a box with L=1L = 1, projected onto two box states. Each coefficient cn=⟨ψn∣ψ⟩c_n = \langle \psi_n \vert \psi\rangle is the area under the product ψnψ\psi_n\psi, purple where it is positive and orange where it is negative. Left: ψ\psi and ψ1\psi_1 nearly coincide, and c1=0.999c_1 = 0.999. Right: the three lobes of ψ3ψ\psi_3\psi almost cancel, leaving c3=0.037c_3 = 0.037.

a vector in a planea function
axes∣u1⟩,∣u2⟩\lvert u_1\rangle, \lvert u_2\rangleeigenfunctions ∣ϕ1⟩,∣ϕ2⟩,…\lvert\phi_1\rangle, \lvert\phi_2\rangle, \dots
orthonormal⟨uj∣uk⟩=δjk\langle u_j \vert u_k\rangle = \delta_{jk}⟨ϕm∣ϕn⟩=δmn\langle \phi_m \vert \phi_n\rangle = \delta_{mn}
build∣v⟩=∑kck∣uk⟩\lvert v\rangle = \sum_k c_k\lvert u_k\rangle∣ψ⟩=∑ncn∣ϕn⟩\lvert\psi\rangle = \sum_n c_n\lvert\phi_n\rangle
projectck=⟨uk∣v⟩c_k = \langle u_k \vert v\ranglecn=⟨ϕn∣ψ⟩c_n = \langle \phi_n \vert \psi\rangle
the bracketmultiply matching components, addmultiply point by point, integrate
Source
Loading...

Fig. A narrow packet centered at x=0.3Lx = 0.3L rebuilt from box states one at a time. Top: the sum of the first kk terms cnψnc_n\psi_n against the packet. Bottom: ∣cn∣2\lvert c_n\rvert^2 for each state, lit once it is included. About ten states are needed before the sum holds 99 percent of the probability.

A measurement returns an eigenvalue

⟨ψ∣ψ⟩=∑m∑ncm∗ cn ⟨ϕm∣ϕn⟩=∑n∣cn∣2=1\langle \psi \vert \psi \rangle = \sum_m\sum_n c_m^*\,c_n\,\langle \phi_m \vert \phi_n \rangle = \sum_n \lvert c_n\rvert^2 = 1

Try it: pick a state and press +1 box a few times. Each press prepares a fresh box in that state and measures its energy once; after a single reading, measure it again reads the same box a second time. Then add a thousand boxes. Every reading is one of the energies En=n2E1E_n = n^2E_1 of the box, never anything in between. The bars approach ∣cn∣2\lvert c_n\rvert^2 and the running mean approaches a value we compute next.

Averages and spreads

⟨ψ∣A^∣ψ⟩=∑m∑ncm∗ cn ⟨ϕm∣A^∣ϕn⟩=∑m∑ncm∗ cn an δmn=∑n∣cn∣2 an\langle \psi \vert \hat{A} \vert \psi \rangle = \sum_m\sum_n c_m^*\,c_n\,\langle \phi_m \vert \hat{A} \vert \phi_n \rangle = \sum_m\sum_n c_m^*\,c_n\,a_n\,\delta_{mn} = \sum_n \lvert c_n\rvert^2\,a_n
p_1, p_2, p_3: [0.99856 0.      0.00137]
sum of p_n: 1.0
<E> = sum p_n E_n: 1.0132 E1
<E> = <psi|H|psi>: 1.0132 E1   (exact: 10/pi^2 = 1.0132 E1)
integralDiracnumpy on a grid
expansion coefficientcn=∫ϕn∗ ψ dxc_n = \int \phi_n^*\,\psi\,dxcn=⟨ϕn∣ψ⟩c_n = \langle \phi_n \vert \psi \ranglec = phi.conj().T @ psi * dx
probability of ana_n∣cn∣2\lvert c_n\rvert^2∣⟨ϕn∣ψ⟩∣2\lvert\langle \phi_n \vert \psi \rangle\rvert^2p = np.abs(c)**2
average∑n∣cn∣2an\sum_n \lvert c_n\rvert^2 a_n⟨ψ∣A^∣ψ⟩\langle \psi \vert \hat{A} \vert \psi \ranglep @ a

After the measurement

Source
<Figure size 860x390 with 5 Axes>

Fig. One energy measurement on the superposition of the example. Before: three possible readings, with probabilities 14\frac{1}{4}, 14\frac{1}{4} and 12\frac{1}{2}. The reading happens to be 9E19E_1. After: the state is ψ3\psi_3, and all the probability sits on 9E19E_1.

Compatible and incompatible observables

Position and momentum: spikes and plane waves

operatoreigenfunctionssharp valuespread over
x^\hat{x}spikes δ(x−x0)\delta(x - x_0)position x0x_0every momentum
p^\hat{p}plane waves eipx/ℏe^{ipx/\hbar}momentum ppevery position
Source
<Figure size 1000x440 with 4 Axes>

Fig. Each kind of eigenfunction is a sum of the other kind (real parts drawn). Left: plane waves of many momenta with equal weights add up to a spike, a sharp position. Right: spikes at every grid point, each weighted by the value of eip0x/ℏe^{ip_0x/\hbar} there, add up to a plane wave, a sharp momentum.

Fig. A Gaussian built from plane waves. Drag the slider to squeeze or widen it. Top left: seven of the plane waves, each drawn with its weight; all of them crest together at x=0x = 0. Below them: the sum over all momenta, the Gaussian itself. Right: the weights ∣ϕ(p)∣2\lvert\phi(p)\rvert^2, with the seven waves marked in matching colours. Wide in position, the packet holds a narrow band of momenta and is nearly one plane wave. Squeezed, it needs a wide band: waves of very different wavelength agree only near x=0x = 0 and cancel everywhere else.

Energy and momentum in a box

Source
<Figure size 1000x490 with 6 Axes>

Fig. Two states in a box, each with its energy and momentum readings. Top: the box state ψ5\psi_5 gives one energy, 25E125E_1, every time. Its momentum readings fall in two humps near p=±2mE5=±5πℏ/Lp = \pm\sqrt{2mE_5} = \pm 5\pi\hbar/L (dashed), because the sine is half a wave moving right and half moving left, sin⁡kx=(eikx−e−ikx)/2i\sin kx = (e^{ikx} - e^{-ikx})/2i; the walls cut the wave off after a length LL, which broadens each hump by about h/Lh/L. Bottom: a Gaussian packet moving right at about the same speed. Its momentum readings form one hump on the positive side, but its energy readings spread over several levels. Neither state is sharp in both.

The uncertainty principle

Source
Loading...

Fig. A Gaussian squeezed and released. Left: the position distribution. Middle: the momentum distribution, which widens as the position narrows. Right: the two spreads on log axes. The gray region below σxσp=ℏ/2\sigma_x\sigma_p = \hbar/2 is forbidden. The Gaussian rides exactly on the boundary, the least uncertain state possible; the ground state of a box of matching size (square) sits a little above it, at 0.57 ℏ0.57\,\hbar.

Problems

Problem 1: Complex coefficients

A particle in a box is in the state ψ=12(ψ1+i ψ2)\psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\big(\psi_1 + i\,\psi_2\big). What energies can be measured, with what probabilities? Find ⟨E⟩\langle E\rangle and σE\sigma_E.

Problem 2: Averages of observables are real

Show that ⟨A⟩=⟨ψ∣A^∣ψ⟩\langle A\rangle = \langle \psi \vert \hat{A} \vert \psi \rangle is a real number whenever A^\hat{A} is Hermitian, for every state ψ\psi.

Problem 3: Two measurements in a row

A particle in a box is in the state ψ=12(3 ψ1+ψ2)\psi = \frac{1}{2}\big(\sqrt{3}\,\psi_1 + \psi_2\big). (a) What is the probability that an energy measurement gives E1E_1? (b) The reading is in fact 4E14E_1. What is the state right after, and what does a second energy measurement give? (c) Next the position is measured. Where is the particle never found?

Problem 4: The spread of the parabola

For the parabola ψ=30/L5 x(L−x)\psi = \sqrt{30/L^5}\,x(L-x) of the worked example, 99.86 percent of the energy readings give exactly E1E_1. Find σE\sigma_E, using ∑n odd1/n2=π2/8\sum_{n\ \text{odd}} 1/n^2 = \pi^2/8 and ∑n odd1/n4=π4/96\sum_{n\ \text{odd}} 1/n^4 = \pi^4/96.

Problem 5: Expanding a tent

The tent state rises linearly from zero at x=0x = 0 to a peak at x=L/2x = L/2 and falls back linearly to zero at x=Lx = L. Normalize it, then find its expansion coefficients in box states, either by integrating by parts or numerically with the grid code above. What is the probability of measuring E1E_1? How many states hold 99.9 percent of the probability? Compare with the parabola, and explain the difference using the sharp corner of the tent.

Problem 6: Momentum of the ground state

Compute the momentum distribution ∣ϕ1(p)∣2\lvert\phi_1(p)\rvert^2 of the box ground state numerically, from ϕ1(p)=(2πℏ)−1/2∫0Lψ1(x) e−ipx/ℏ dx\phi_1(p) = (2\pi\hbar)^{-1/2}\int_0^L \psi_1(x)\,e^{-ipx/\hbar}\,dx. Check that it is normalized and that its spread is σp=πℏ/L\sigma_p = \pi\hbar/L. Why is it largest at p=0p = 0 rather than at p=±πℏ/Lp = \pm\pi\hbar/L?

Problem 7: An uncertainty relation for energy and position

Use [x^,H^]=iℏ p^/m[\hat{x},\hat{H}] = i\hbar\,\hat{p}/m (Problem 5 of Operators 2 leads to it) in the general uncertainty principle to show σx σE≥ℏ2m∣⟨p⟩∣\sigma_x\,\sigma_E \geq \frac{\hbar}{2m}\lvert\langle p\rangle\rvert. Evaluate the bound for a box eigenstate and for a free packet moving with average momentum p0p_0. Why does a stationary state escape any constraint?

Problem 8: Phases you can see

The states ψ±=12(ψ1±ψ2)\psi_\pm = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\big(\psi_1 \pm \psi_2\big) in a box give identical energy statistics. Compute ⟨x⟩\langle x\rangle for each, and sketch ∣ψ±∣2\lvert\psi_\pm\rvert^2. Which measurement tells them apart, and why can no energy measurement do it?