Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Tunneling and the Finite Square Well

Acknowledgement

The finite-well part of this lecture follows the excellent paper in J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 8, 1663-1670.

A ball bounces back, a wave gets through

Source
Loading...

Fig. A wavepacket with mean energy E=0.63 V0E = 0.63\,V_0 meets a thin barrier. Top: a classical ball with the same energy always turns back. Bottom: ∣Ψ(x,t)∣2|\Psi(x,t)|^2, drawn on its energy level. Most of the probability reflects, but about a quarter tunnels through and travels on.

Walls of finite height

d2ψdx2=2mℏ2 (V−E) ψ\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = \frac{2m}{\hbar^2}\,\big(V - E\big)\,\psi

Where E>VE > V, the curvature ψ′′\psi'' has the opposite sign to ψ\psi: above the axis the curve bends down, below it bends up, so it keeps bending back toward the axis and oscillates. Where E<VE < V, ψ′′\psi'' has the same sign as ψ\psi, so the curve bends away from the axis and grows or decays exponentially. The larger ∣E−V∣|E - V|, the harder it bends: a shorter wavelength in the first case, a faster decay in the second (see the Schrödinger equation lecture for this rule in pictures).

V(x)={0,∣x∣<L/2V0,∣x∣≥L/2V(x) = \begin{cases} 0, & |x| < L/2 \\ V_0, & |x| \geq L/2 \end{cases}
−ℏ22md2ψdx2=Eψ⟹d2ψdx2=−k2ψ,k=2mEℏ-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = E\psi \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = -k^2\psi, \qquad k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}

Its solutions oscillate: ψ=Asin⁡kx+Bcos⁡kx\psi = A\sin kx + B\cos kx.

−ℏ22md2ψdx2+V0ψ=Eψ⟹d2ψdx2=+β2ψ,β=2m(V0−E)ℏ-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} + V_0\psi = E\psi \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} = +\beta^2\psi, \qquad \beta = \frac{\sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}}{\hbar}
Source
<Figure size 800x310 with 1 Axes>

Fig. The ground state of a finite well, drawn on its energy level. Inside the well ψ\psi oscillates; in the walls it decays as e−β∣x∣e^{-\beta|x|}. The shaded tails are probability in the classically forbidden region, and 1/β1/\beta marks the penetration depth.

Reading a wavefunction from its potential

A stepped potential above, and the wavefunction it produces below

Figure 1:A stepped potential (top) and the wavefunction it produces (bottom). Large E−VE - V gives a short wavelength and a small amplitude, small V−EV - E gives a slow decay, and the slopes match at every step.

Joining the pieces

I:x≤−L2,V=V0,ψI=A eβxII:−L2≤x≤L2,V=0,ψII=Bcos⁡kx+Csin⁡kxIII:x≥L2,V=V0,ψIII=D e−βx\begin{aligned} \text{I:}\quad & x \leq -\tfrac{L}{2}, & V &= V_0, & \psi_{I} &= A\,e^{\beta x} \\ \text{II:}\quad & -\tfrac{L}{2} \leq x \leq \tfrac{L}{2}, & V &= 0, & \psi_{II} &= B\cos kx + C\sin kx \\ \text{III:}\quad & x \geq \tfrac{L}{2}, & V &= V_0, & \psi_{III} &= D\,e^{-\beta x} \end{aligned}
ψI(−L2)=ψII(−L2),ψI′(−L2)=ψII′(−L2)\psi_{I}\left(-\tfrac{L}{2}\right) = \psi_{II}\left(-\tfrac{L}{2}\right), \qquad \psi'_{I}\left(-\tfrac{L}{2}\right) = \psi'_{II}\left(-\tfrac{L}{2}\right)
ψII(L2)=ψIII(L2),ψII′(L2)=ψIII′(L2)\psi_{II}\left(\tfrac{L}{2}\right) = \psi_{III}\left(\tfrac{L}{2}\right), \qquad \psi'_{II}\left(\tfrac{L}{2}\right) = \psi'_{III}\left(\tfrac{L}{2}\right)
Source
<Figure size 480x440 with 2 Axes>

Fig. A cosine inside the well joined to decaying exponentials in the walls, with the values matched. Top: at a trial energy the slopes disagree, leaving a kink at each wall. Bottom: at the allowed energy the value and the slope both match.

Even and odd states

inside: ψ′=−kBsin⁡kx,wall: ψ′=−βDe−βx\text{inside: } \psi' = -kB\sin kx, \qquad \text{wall: } \psi' = -\beta De^{-\beta x}

Now require that the values agree and that the slopes agree at x=L/2x = L/2:

value: Bcos⁡kL2=De−βL/2,slope: −kBsin⁡kL2=−βDe−βL/2\text{value: } B\cos\frac{kL}{2} = De^{-\beta L/2}, \qquad \text{slope: } -kB\sin\frac{kL}{2} = -\beta De^{-\beta L/2}

Dividing the slope equation by the value equation removes the unknown amplitudes BB and DD, and leaves a condition on the energy alone:

β=ktan⁡kL2\beta = k\tan\frac{kL}{2}
β=−kcot⁡kL2\beta = -k\cot\frac{kL}{2}
z=kL2,η=βL2,z0=L2 2mV0ℏz = \frac{kL}{2}, \qquad \eta = \frac{\beta L}{2}, \qquad z_0 = \frac{L}{2}\,\frac{\sqrt{2mV_0}}{\hbar}

Because k2+β2=2mV0/ℏ2k^2 + \beta^2 = 2mV_0/\hbar^2 does not depend on EE, the two unknowns lie on a circle, z2+η2=z02z^2 + \eta^2 = z_0^2.

Finding the energies graphically

N=1+⌊2z0π⌋N = 1 + \left\lfloor \frac{2z_0}{\pi} \right\rfloor

Fig. Left: the graphical solution, with the even branches in teal and the odd branches in purple crossed by the circle of radius z0z_0. Right: the resulting levels of an electron in the well, with the levels of an infinite box of the same width dashed in gray.

Here are some questions to think about:

Wavefunctions and the probability of leaking out

Source
<Figure size 800x360 with 3 Axes>

Fig. The four bound states of an electron in a finite well 5 eV deep and 10 Å wide. Left: ψn\psi_n drawn on its level, even states in teal and odd states in purple. Middle: ∣ψn∣2|\psi_n|^2, with the probability in the walls shaded and quoted. Right: the finite-well levels against those of an infinite box of the same width.

Pout=∫−∞−L/2∣ψ(x)∣2 dx+∫L/2∞∣ψ(x)∣2 dxP_{\text{out}} = \int_{-\infty}^{-L/2} |\psi(x)|^2\,dx + \int_{L/2}^{\infty} |\psi(x)|^2\,dx

Tunneling through a barrier

V(x)={V0,0<x<a0,otherwiseV(x) = \begin{cases} V_0, & 0 < x < a \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}

meets a particle that comes in from the left with E<V0E < V_0. The particle is free on both sides, so nothing quantizes its energy. The question now is what fraction of the incoming wave gets through.

x<0:ψ=eikx+r e−ikxincident and reflected0<x<a:ψ=C eβx+D e−βxinside the barrierx>a:ψ=t eikxtransmitted\begin{aligned} x < 0: &\quad \psi = e^{ikx} + r\,e^{-ikx} && \text{incident and reflected} \\ 0 < x < a: &\quad \psi = C\,e^{\beta x} + D\,e^{-\beta x} && \text{inside the barrier} \\ x > a: &\quad \psi = t\,e^{ikx} && \text{transmitted} \end{aligned}

with the same kk and β\beta as before. Inside the barrier both exponentials stay, since neither can blow up over a finite width. On the right there is only an outgoing wave, because nothing comes in from the right.

Source
<Figure size 800x330 with 1 Axes>

Fig. The three pieces of the wave at a barrier with E=V0/2E = V_0/2 and width 1/β1/\beta. The incident wave has amplitude 1. The reflected wave carries back the fraction R=∣r∣2R = |r|^2 of the incident flux, and the transmitted wave carries on with T=∣t∣2T = |t|^2; the widths of the arrows show the flux.

Source
Loading...

Fig. A wave with energy E=V0/2E = V_0/2 meets a barrier that slowly widens. Left: the real part of the wave as it oscillates in time, incident plus reflected on the left, decaying inside the barrier, and transmitted with amplitude ∣t∣|t| on the right. Right: TT on a log scale, where the exponential becomes a straight line.

Width and mass sit in the exponent

Fig. T≈e−2βaT \approx e^{-2\beta a} against the barrier width for an electron, a proton and a deuteron facing the same barrier, on a log scale. The dots mark the chosen width.

Tunneling at work

The scanning tunneling microscope

I∝e−2βd,β=2meϕℏI \propto e^{-2\beta d}, \qquad \beta = \frac{\sqrt{2m_e\phi}}{\hbar}
Source
Loading...

Fig. A tip scans at constant height over a row of surface atoms (gray) and one adatom (orange) whose top sits 1 Å higher. The tunneling current, drawn below, follows the gap exponentially: the adatom gives about nine times the current of a surface atom.

Ammonia turns inside out

Source
Loading...

Fig. A molecule starts in the left well of a double well. Its density ∣Ψ(x,t)∣2|\Psi(x,t)|^2, drawn on the energy of the doublet, tunnels to the right well and back with period h/Δh/\Delta, set by the splitting of the even and odd levels. Right: the probability of finding the molecule in the right well.

More tunneling

Three tunneling problems: a square barrier, the ammonia double well, and the band diagram of a tunnel diode

Figure 2:Three early successes of tunneling. Left: electrons escaping a metal through a square barrier (Nordheim, 1927). Middle: inversion of ammonia through the barrier of its double well (Uhlenbeck, 1932). Right: the tunnel diode, in which electrons and holes tunnel across a p-n junction about 10 nm wide (Esaki, 1957).

Problems

Problem 1: Penetration depth

An electron in a molecule has an energy 3 eV below the top of the surrounding barrier. (a) Find its penetration depth. (b) By what factor has ∣ψ∣2|\psi|^2 fallen 2 Å into the barrier? (c) Repeat (a) for a hydrogen atom, about 1837 electron masses.

Problem 2: How many bound states?

(a) How many bound states does an electron have in a well 1 eV deep and 10 Å wide? (b) What is the smallest depth for which a well 2 Å wide holds a second state?

Problem 3: A shallow well always binds

Show that the even condition η=ztan⁡z\eta = z\tan z, with z2+η2=z02z^2 + \eta^2 = z_0^2, has a solution for every z0>0z_0 > 0, however small. For z0≪1z_0 \ll 1 find the energy and the penetration depth of this state, and describe what it looks like.

Problem 4: Through a barrier

An electron with E=1E = 1 eV meets a barrier 2 eV high and 5 Å wide. (a) Compute TT from the exact formula. (b) Compare with the thick-barrier approximation. (c) How does TT change if the width is doubled?

Problem 5: Reading an STM

An STM tip with ϕ=4.5\phi = 4.5 eV passes over a feature and the current drops to half. How much farther from the tip is the surface there?

Problem 6: An effective box length

The ground state of an electron in the well 5 eV deep and 10 Å wide lies at 0.272 eV. Find its penetration depth, then treat the well as an infinite box widened by one penetration depth on each side, Leff=L+2/βL_{\text{eff}} = L + 2/\beta. Compare h2/8mLeff2h^2/8mL_{\text{eff}}^2 with the exact energy and with the infinite-box value h2/8mL2h^2/8mL^2.

Problem 7: Counting states with the slider

Use the finite-well slider to find the smallest depth at which a well 10 Å wide holds three bound states. Check your answer with N=1+⌊2z0/π⌋N = 1 + \lfloor 2z_0/\pi \rfloor, then compare that depth with the levels of an infinite box of the same width. What pattern do you see?

Problem 8: The isotope effect

For a barrier 0.3 eV above the energy and 0.4 Å wide, compute THT_H, TDT_D and their ratio. Which change makes the ratio grow faster: doubling the width, or doubling the height of the barrier above the energy?

Problem 9: Electron transfer in proteins

Rates of electron transfer between redox centers in proteins fall with distance RR roughly as e−βETRe^{-\beta_{\text{ET}}R}, with βET≈1.4 A˚−1\beta_{\text{ET}} \approx 1.4\ \text{Å}^{-1}. If the protein acts as a square barrier, what barrier height V0−EV_0 - E does this decay constant correspond to? Compare your answer with the energy needed to remove an electron from an organic molecule, about 8 to 10 eV, and suggest why the two differ.

Problem 10: Ammonia and its isotopes

The inversion splitting of NH₃ is 0.79 cm⁻¹ and that of ND₃ is 0.053 cm⁻¹. (a) Convert each splitting to a frequency and to a period h/Δh/\Delta. (b) The splitting is roughly proportional to the tunneling amplitude e−βae^{-\beta a}, not to its square. Assuming the umbrella motion’s effective mass doubles from NH₃ to ND₃, use the ratio of the two splittings to estimate βa\beta a for NH₃.

References
  1. Cruzeiro, V. W. D., Gao, X., & Kleiman, V. D. (2019). Implementing New Educational Platforms in the Classroom: An Interactive Approach to the Particle in a Box Problem. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1663–1670. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00195